The conversation around Big Data has mostly shifted from
“what is it?” to “how do we handle it?” and with this shift there has been much
excitement around data scientists. But while data scientists are adept at
many things, a large enterprise hoping to truly capitalize on the value in
their data needs more than a team of brilliant data scientists – it needs a
strategic leader capable of governing and managing the data, with the authority
to enact strategy across departments.
At some organizations this has involved appointing a Chief
Data Officer, and many more have appointed a senior leadership position
with the same focus – but without elevating the role to the C-suite. Although
the individual may not be called a CDO, it is more about the scope of
responsibility than the title itself. Someone in the organization has to be
ultimately responsible for the data.
Although many have been quick to brush this latest addition
to the C-suite as just another fad, David Linthicum addresses this skepticism
aptly when
he writes:
“I’m not a big fan of creating positions around trends in technology. Back in the day, we had the chief object officer, chief PC officer, chief Web officers, you name it. However, data is not a trend. It’s systemic to what a business is, and thus the focus on managing it better, and centrally, is a positive step.”
Data is not a fad. In fact, data is exponentially increasing
every day, hour, and second of the
day, for every business. This means many things: increasing data management
challenges, increasing opportunities to better understand customers, increasing
privacy concerns, increasing advantages for marketing, and much more. Of the
many uncertainties surrounding Big Data, its existence now (I’m referring to
the data itself, not the buzzword) and going forward should not be one of them.
When the conversation surrounding Big Data dies down, it will most likely be
because massive data has become the new normal, not because it has disappeared.
CDOIQ
I was invited by Peter Anlyan to speak as a panelist at MIT’s Chief Data Officer and
Information Quality Symposium (CDOIQ) in July, discussing how the industry
is bridging the talent gap in analytics and data science. As we in the industry
are all well aware, there is more focus than ever before on quantitative
professionals, but the shortage of qualified analytics professionals and data
scientists has made hiring a significant
challenge for many companies.
The talent shortage is great enough, in fact, that some company
representatives at the symposium expressed concern about sending their teams to
Master’s programs for deeper training, lest they be poached away, defeating the
investment of time and resources. While high attrition may be a frustrating
symptom of the times, I’m not sure they have a choice.
Luckily, the increase in MOOC’s (Massive Online Open Courses)
and various bootcamps across the country could offer an alternative to
companies not willing to risk investing in a time and money into a full-fledged
Master’s program. The efficacy of those methods however, depends on the
strength of the program as well as the learning style of the individual, as
Irmak Sirer of Datascope Analytics noted
in his guest post last week.
Having just read Karen O’Leonard’s report from Deloitte, Show Me the Money: How to Secure Funding for
Your Talent Analytics Case I was
also eager to hear her thoughts on HR and talent analytics at CDOIQ, as well as
attend some of the other events to hear more about the development of the Chief Data Officer
position. You can read more about Karen’s thoughts from CDOIQ here, and Gregory Piatetsky of kdnuggets also had some good
insights from the symposium.
The Future of the C-Suite
My thoughts on the longevity of the CDO role are that the
responsibilities are the important part, not the title. Gartner predicts that by
2015, 25% of large global organizations will have appointed Chief Data
Officers, so it will be interesting to see if that holds true. If we’re predicting the future in
C-Level hires though, perhaps
it’s time for a Chief Analytics Officer to throw their hat in the ring?
2 comments:
Yes, yes, let's add another Chief! Let's see...a CDO + CIO + CFO + CQO + CSO + CNO +
CMO + ... (last two are from healthcare).
What's left for the CEO to do? Ridiculous.
Good Comment Wayne. The fashion statement of having multiple "Chief Whatever Officers" is running wild. Needless to say it violates all fundamental tenants of Leadership and Organizational Dynamics. It does however provide a platform for hyping personal agendas for many in this business. Sad, very sad.
Post a Comment